In the II study group were symptomatic participants with TMD. In the I study group were participants with fixed dentures with prosthetic ceramic restorations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 54 subjects were divided into three groups, selection based on anamnesis-responded to a Fonseca questionnaire and clinical measurements analysed with electronic system T-scan III. AIM: The aim of this study is to determine if any direct relationship exists between balanced occlusion and Temporomandibular disorder and to evaluate the differences between subjective balanced occlusion and measurements reported with T-scan III electronic system. Lila-Krasniqi, Zana Shala, Kujtim Krasniqi, Teuta Pustina Bicaj, Teuta Ahmedi, Enis Dula, Linda Dragusha, Arlinda Tmava Guguvcevski, LjubenīACKGROUND: The aetiology of Temporomandibular disorder is multifactorial, and numerous studies have addressed that occlusion may be of great importance in the pathogenesis of Temporomandibular disorder. Differences between Subjective Balanced Occlusion and Measurements Reported With T-Scan III
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |